|
5-22-2003
Tied for 73rd
Buddy of mine, a former card-carrying
PGA member I might add, was quite dismissive of Annika Sorenstam's
participation in this week's PGA tour event in Texas. Wednesday
night he contended the key qualification for playing in a PGA tournament,
outside of skill, was having a penis. "Why can't I go play on the LPGA?" he
asked.
It's a legitimate question, but
it's also a case of how you can't get the right answer by asking
the wrong question.
There are basic double standards
in the world as we know it -- that an all-white school is wrong
but predominately black colleges are okay, that all kinds of things
can be limited to women-only, but anything male-only is discriminatory.
These double standards are not new; Emerson wrote of "consistency
being the hobgoblin of small minds" more than a century ago.
As much as we want the world to
be clear between right and wrong, good and bad, black and white,
it is not now nor has it ever been. Thou shall not kill may have
been a commandment for 2,000 years, but war and self-defense have
been exceptions for 2,000 years. Freedom of speech has been an American
standard for 200 years, but for nearly one hundred years you haven't
had the right to cry "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.
Sorenstam's participation in the
Bank of America Colonial Tournament is an illustration of subservient
rights versus equal rights. If that sounds high-faluting and philosophical,
here's a simple example -- subservient versus equal is at the heart
of the abortion debate (the notion that the rights of the mother
trump the rights of the fetus).
In a country that pulls for the
underdog, in a country that's built on being all that you can be,
the societal norm said Annika Sorenstam deserved -- and got -- the
right to try and compete at a higher level. Too bad it made for
messy ethical questions; it made a great story.
Once you cut through the clutter
and the spin, what Sorenstam actually showed on her first day was
just how damn good the PGA golfers are. She had 10 holes played
while under par, and 15 pars total. She had one birdie, two bogeys,
finished one-over on the day -- and she tied for 73rd.
Here's another way to look at
it. This week's PGA course is 1,018 yards longer than the one being
played on the women's side (7,080 to 6,062). Even more damning is
that the shorter LPGA course has a higher par (72 to 70).
Sorenstam, in terms of driving
length, is the Tiger Woods of the LPGA, consistently outblasting
her rivals. And according to the AP, she averaged 248 yards per
drive on Thursday. She hit 13 of 14 fairways and 14 of 18 greens.
Those are quality golf numbers, and it put her in a tie for 73rd.
Sorenstam got to show she wouldn't be an embarrassment, and the
men got to set the definition of quality golf.
The biggest groan heard on the
bogey 18th wasn't from Sorenstam fans but from network executives.
This tournament will get ridiculously high ratings if she makes
the cut and gets to play this weekend. Until that bogey, she was
in good shape -- tied at 30-something. Now, tied for 73rd, making
the cut is far more dicey. There are 113 players in the field.
Tied for 73rd and praying to make
the cut is the lament of most PGA newcomers. The fact that Sorenstam
is a woman may drive the media attention, but numbers drive the
golf leader boards, and the numbers put her in a big class of people
-- folks who are damn good golfers, yet not good enough to be among
the best in the world.
Now I suspect few of these PGA
pros would play her for money while letting her hit from the ladies'
tee, and that's the ultimate moral of this story. She didn't ask
for a special advantage, some affirmative action to make up for
past imbalances. She lined up with the men and took a whack at it.
And she tied for 73rd.
-30-
Return
to The Marshall Occasional home page
|